ReconnectUK17 Event notes


#21

The major tools used in the UK to collect impacts data were surveyed by the WG.


#22

Anna Clements starts to talk about CASRAI-UK Impacts.


#23

We need to ensure all terms used within our definitions are clear and as precise as possible and perhaps give examples otherwise e.g.‘description’ of impact open to wide interpretation


#24


#25

Suggestion to ensure worked with Vertigo Ventures in impact taxonomy


#26


#27

They should be encouraged to contribute their model as a proposed element in these open standards.


#28

Yes we can speak to Laura.


#29

Lots of debate about the efficacy (or otherwise) of impact taxonomies…


#30

Laura is on the delegate list, and so might perhaps be here later / tomorrow?


#31

Yes. If not can follow up. Had a good long chat with her at ARMA.


#32


#33


#34

Lots of linked activity. Personally I think most are seperate entities but linked - let’s try to define them.


#35


#36


#37

Career levels done in stages as job descriptions and titles felt to be too varied.


#38

Education, Training, Consolidation, Exploration etc. Some career stage terms capturing progression and providing food for thought.


#39

Permadoc - not in a ‘stage’ maybe ‘stability’ would be good additional info for folk at that stage.


#40

I agree - progression makes it sounds like you’ll be moving on - better to change the term I think